例句與造句

1. A coal export facility known as the Gateway Pacific Terminal was proposed to be built here.
2. On June 1, 2011, more than 300 persons turned out for a hearing regarding the Gateway Pacific Terminal hosted by Mayor Dan Pike of nearby Bellingham, Washington.
3. A December 2014 study by the Washington State Department of Ecology stated that the construction of the Gateway Pacific Terminal would cause an increase in potential oil spills, leading to environmental damage and disruption of traditional fishing grounds.
4. On August 27, 2015, the Lummi Indian Business Council and the Lummi Nation sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers requesting an expedited decision on the status of the Gateway Pacific Terminal, stating " We remain committed to assisting the Corps in evaluating our request for a permit denial.
5. However, we are not interested in engaging in a lengthy dialogue with the project proponent and do not anticipate the necessity of responding further . " Additionally, the Lummi Nation announced on the same date that they were hiring Dentons, the world's largest law firm, to represent them in future lawsuits, indicating the Lummi are preparing for a fight in the courts over the Gateway Pacific Terminal.
6. It's difficult to find gateway pacific terminal in a sentence. 用gateway pacific terminal造句挺難的
7. On June 3, 2011 in the aftermath of the June 1 meeting, Mayor Pike announced his opposition to the Gateway Pacific Terminal project, stating " At this point, I don't think this community wants to see any coal, and I'm kind of with them on that, " and critiqued the concerns over employment opportunities, stating " We cannot turn our backs on people who are struggling in this community, but that doesn't mean we take jobs at any cost ."
8. The Lummi Nation argues that the construction of the Gateway Pacific Terminal violates their treaty rights under the 1855 Treaty of Point Elliot, which under Article 5 grants signatory nations " The right of taking fish at usual and accustomed grounds and stations is further secured to said Indians in common with all citizens of the Territory . " Further, they argue the presence of the terminal could " irrevocably damage religious and sacred sites, such as Cherry Point, if the coal should spill . " Previous requests for permits in the area, including for a proposed salmon fishery, have been rejected on similar grounds.